MOHAMED EL GAZZAR, SAIF ALMAGHRABI, RYOOF SARHAN, DEMAH HAMDI AL SUFYANI, ASEEL MOHAMMED ALRADADI, AHMED HABIB HMED ALLUQMANI, ABDULRAHMAN MOHAMMED ALI ,RUBA MAHMOUD ABDULLAH ALMUALLIM, MANAR ABOBAKR, FAISAL FALEH ALHARBI, RIMAA KHALID MAJAL ALQAHTANI, SARAH MOHAMMED AWADH ALQAHTANI, ASMA ALI ALSHAMRANI, ABDULLAH HASSAN AL HMOAD
DOI: https://doi.org/Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most prevalent malignancies among men worldwide, and accurate early detection is critical for optimizing treatment outcomes. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has emerged as a non-invasive diagnostic tool that may improve sensitivity and reduce unnecessary biopsies.
Objective
To systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI for detecting prostate cancer compared with biopsy, including assessment of its role in detecting clinically significant disease.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, covering studies published between 2010 and 2024. Sixteen eligible studies were included, encompassing prospective and retrospective cohorts, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. Data extraction focused on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, with risk of bias assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
Results
mpMRI demonstrated high sensitivity (often >85%) and excellent NPV (>90%) across included studies, particularly for clinically significant prostate cancer. Targeted biopsies guided by mpMRI outperformed systematic biopsies in diagnostic yield and reduced over-detection of indolent tumors. However, specificity varied widely (11–79%), and reduced visibility was noted for cribriform and intraductal carcinoma subtypes. Biparametric MRI (bpMRI) showed comparable accuracy in selected cohorts, with advantages in efficiency and cost.
